← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29821/2019dismissed

Vasudan v. The State Of Bihar

2019-08-01Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29821 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-173 Year-2018 Thana- THAKURGANJ DistrictKishanganj ====================================================== 1.

VASUDAN, aged about 65 years, female, Wife of Late Amiruddin, Resident of Village Dhumgarh P.S. Thakurganj, District- Kishanganj. 2.

Mustafa @ Md. Mustafa aged about 48 years, male, Son of Late Amiruddin, Resident of Village Dhumgarh P.S. Thakurganj, DistrictKishanganj. 3.

Shakir aged about 30 years, male, Son of Late Amiruddin, Resident of Village Dhumgarh P.S. Thakurganj, District- Kishanganj. ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party:

APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 01-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Thakurganj P.S. Case No. 173 of 2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated merely because they happen to be mother-in-law and two brothers-in-law respectively of the deceased. The accusations are general and omnibus. The husband is in custody. The petitioners claim clean antecedents.

4. Learned APP appears and opposes the petition on the basis of case diary, submitting that the accusations against the petitioners have been made with regard to demand of dowry.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29821 of 2019(3) dt.01-08-2019 2/2

5. Having regard to the nature of accusations and the gravity of the offence alleged, this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of bail to the petitioners. The anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed.

(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar//- U T