Fulo Poddar @Fulkumar Poddar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25451 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-664 Year-2018 Thana- AMARPUR District- Banka ====================================================== 1.

FULO PODDAR @FULKUMAR PODDAR Son of Late Anandi Poddar Resident of Village - Kaushalpur, P.S.- Amarpur, Distt - Banka. 2.

Vijay Poddar Son of Late Anandi Poddar Resident of Village - Kaushalpur, P.S.- Amarpur, Distt - Banka.

3.

Ashok Poddar Son of Karu Poddar Resident of Village - Kaushalpur, P.S.- Amarpur, Distt - Banka.

4.

Nawal Kishore Poddar Son of Karu Poddar Resident of Village - Kaushalpur, P.S.- Amarpur, Distt - Banka.

5.

Vikash Poddar Son of Vijay Poddar Resident of Village - Kaushalpur, P.S.- Amarpur, Distt - Banka.

6.

Badal Poddar Son of Late Anandi Poddar Resident of Village - Kaushalpur, P.S.- Amarpur, Distt - Banka.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dinesh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 25-06-2019 This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Amarpur P.S. Case No. 664/18, disclosing offences under Sections 447, 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 379, 385, 354(B), 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners is of entering inside the house of informant and assaulting him and also taking away Rs. 50,000/- and when the granddaughter of the informant came coaccused Sonu Poddar tried to outrage her modesty and co-accused Ritesh Kumar and Ranjit Poddar misbehaved with the daughter of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25451 of 2019(5) dt.25-06-2019 2/2 informant and there are further allegation of snatching the golden chain.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is enmity between the parties from before and out of the said enmity, this false case has been lodged and so far criminal antecedent of petitioner no. 1 and 2 are concerned, those case has also been lodged by the informant side. Further submission is that a case has also been lodged by the petitioner no. 2 against the informant and he has also received injuries.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of above facts, this application is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka, in connection with Amarpur P.S. Case No. 664/18, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunilkumar/- U T