Kumud Ranjan Jha @ Dilip Kumar Jha v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.54423 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -168 Year- 2016 Thana -PANDAUL District- MADHUBANI ====================================================== Kumud Ranjan Jha @ Dilip Kumar Jha, S/o Baidhyanath Jha, Resident of Village- Raghopur, P.S.- Manigachhi (Nehra O.P.), District- Darbhanga. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Murari Marain Chaudhary, Advocate Mr. Vijay Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 02-03-2017 This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail for offences punishable under Sections 341, 498A and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner appeared before the Family Court, Darbhanga, for settlement with opposite party no. 2 but opposite party no. 2 has not appeared on the last date. However, petitioner is paying the maintenance amount to opposite party no. 2 and he will abide by any order passed by the learned court.

Heard learned A.P.P. also as well as learned counsel for opposite party no. 2.

Having heard both sides, in view of the fact that

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54423 of 2016 (5) dt.02-03-2017 2/2 petitioner is ready to pay the maintenance amount on each and every month, let above named petitioner, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani, in connection with Pandaul P.S. Case no. 168 of 2016 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and also subject to the conditions that (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall continue to deposit maintenance amount on each month, failing which prosecution is at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bond (3) petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available before the police as and when required.

Accordingly, this application stands disposed of. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudip/- U T