Chandra Shekhar Adhikari And ANR. v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4275 of 2014 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 15489 of 2011 ===========================================================

1. Chandra Shekhar Adhikari Son of Late Lil Bahadur Adhikari, Resident of Mohalla - ML.T. College Campus, P.S. and District - Saharsa at working as Physical Training Instructor, MLT College, Saharsa

2. Brahmdeo Kamat Son of Late Hari Kamat Resident of Mohalla - Khara, P.S. and District - Saharsa at presently working as Physical Training Instructor MLT College, Saharsa .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Sr. R.K. Mahajan, The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3. Sri S.M. Karim, The Director, Higher Education Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

4. The Bhupendra andal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura through the Registrar Bhupendra Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura

5. Sri Kumaresh Prasad Singh, The Registrar, Bhupendra Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura

6. Sri Arun Kumar Mishra, The Finance Officer, Bhupendra Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashi Dhar Jha For the Respondent/s : Mr. P.K. Verma =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 14-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The Vice-Chancellor, B. N. Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura appears in person and tenders unqualified apology, but there cannot be any argument on the fact that for almost four years the directive of the Court had not been carried out. If the university has faced certain difficulty in implementing the order,

Patna High Court MJC No.4275 of 2014 dt.14-09-2016 2/2 they could have very well approached the Court for extending the time-frame fixed by it in the writ application. But procrastination of such issue and reacting only when the matter takes a serious turn is not the answer in compliance of judicial orders. Assurance is given on behalf of the Vice-Chancellor that due care and urgency will be shown in future in matters of judicial orders. It is only hoped and expected that the assurance will be kept in mind in future litigations.

Contempt application stands disposed off.

If any discrepancy emerges in the payment and the accounting, petitioners are free to approach the Registrar of the university, who has an obligation to verify such grievance, if raised. The presence of the Vice-Chancellor stands dispensed with in view of the above.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) SKM/- AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE Uploading Date 16.09.2016 Transmission Date