Anish Thakur @ Anish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27421 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-107 Year-2020 Thana- DULHIN BAZAR District- Patna ====================================================== Anish Thakur @ Anish Kumar, S/o- Late Batohi Thakur, R/v- W.No-3, Rupauli Tola, Dhanuki Bhaluaha Bishanpur, PS- Dumra, Dist- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Deepak Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajendra Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 04-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 147, 148, 504 and 506 of the I.P.C.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner has assaulted with sharp cutting weapon on the head of the informant.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that from perusal of the injury report, it will transpire that though the informant has received a lacerated wound on the scalp of mid brain of size 3" x 01" x 01" which is opined to be grievous but the doctor has also

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27421 of 2026(2) dt.04-05-2026 2/2 opined that the injury was caused by hard and blunt object. It has further been submitted that from perusal of the F.I.R. it is clear that the allegation against the petitioner is that he has assaulted with sharp cutting weapon and the injury which has been received by the informant is of hard and blunt object. The injury does not correlate with the allegation. It has further been submitted that petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 29.01.2026.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. 1st Class, Danapur in connection with Dulhin Bazar P.S. Case No. 107 of 2020.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T