Jago Yadav @ Jagdish Yadav @ Jagdish Prasad Yadav And ORS. v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.3153 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -402 Year- 2010 Thana -NAWADAH COMPLAINT CASE DistrictNAWADA ======================================================
1. Jago Yadav @ Jagdish Yadav @ Jagdish Prasad Yadav, Son of Late Dahu Yadav
2. Dinesh Prasad Yadav @ Munni Yadav @ Maheshwar Yadav, Son of Jago Yadav
3. Moti Yadav @ Moti Prasad Yadav, S/o Jago Yadav
4. Dini Yadav @ Muneshwar Prasad Yadav @ Muni Yadav Son of Jago Yadav
5. Sharda Devi @ Kalwa Devi Wife of Munni Yadav
6. Sanjay Yadav @ Sanjay Prasad Yadav Son of Jago Yadav
7. Manoj Yadav @ Manoj Prasad S/o Jago Yadav All resident of VillageDibaur Tola Gopalpur, P.S.- Rajauli, District- Nawada .... .... Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Kamla Devi W/o Late Ranjeet Ram, Resident of Village- Dibaur Tola Ratanpur, P.S. Rajauli, District Nawada.
.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners : Mr. Surendra Kishore Thakur, Advocate.
For the Opposite Parties : Mr. Ambika Bhagat(Spl.Pp) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-01-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 323, 380 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 3(i)(x) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
The prosecution case is that the accused persons including the petitioners came in the house of the informant assaulted her and abused her by naming her caste and taken away
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3153 of 2016 (2) dt.20-01-2016 2/2 household articles.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that for the occurrence of 03.04.2010, the complaint was filed on 16.04.2010 wherein the cognizance was taken on 15.05.2010. None has received any injury. Statement has been made to this effect in paragraph 9 of the petitioner. The petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. Moreover, the place of occurrence is the house of the informant.
Considering the delay in lodging the case, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Nawada in connection with Complaint Case No. 402 of 2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) KKSINHA/N.H.
U T