← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/7110/2024withdrawn

Md. Izran Khan v. The State Of Bihar

2024-12-17Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7110 of 2024 ====================================================== Md. Izran Khan Son of Md. Nasim Khan, Resident of Ward No. 14, Back side of Misan School, Piro, Piru, P.S.- Piro, District- Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Through Department of Urban Development and Housing, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The District Magistrate Bhojpur at Ara.

3.

The Municipal Commissioner Municipal Corporation Ara, District- Bhojpur. 4.

The Sub Divisional Office Piro, District- Bhojpur. 5.

The Chief Executive Officer Nagar Parisad, Piro, District- Bhojpur. 6.

The Executive Officer Nagar Parisad, Piro, District- Bhojpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms.Kumari Shubham Mr. Shashank Chandra For the Respondent/s :

Ms. Shalini, AC to GP-5 Mr. Gopal Jha, Adv ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 17-12-2024 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AC to GP-5 and learned counsel appearing on behalf of Nagar Panchayat, Piro, Shri. Gopal Jha.

2.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of Nagar Panchayat, Piro, submits that the grievance of the petitioner, as raised in the instant writ application, stands redressed. It is next submitted that a Cheque bearing No. 002358 dated 14-12-2024 drawn on Axis Bank in favour of the petitioner has been issued. 3.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner has received the aforesaid

Patna High Court CWJC No.7110 of 2024(6) dt.17-12-2024 2/2 cheque and has credited it in his bank account for its encashment. Learned counsel next submits that the petitioner hopes that the cheque would be encashed.

4.

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ application as his grievance stands redressed.

5.

The writ application is permitted to be withdrawn. (Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U