← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/6610/2023disposed

Kumar Ravi Shankar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-09-11Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6610 of 2023 ====================================================== Kumar Ravi Shankar S/o Late Satyabrat Singh Resident of Village- Singhia, P.O.- Salempur, P.S.- Singhia, Anchal Snghia, Sub- Division- Rosera, DistrictSamastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principle Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms, Govt. of Bihar.

2.

The Collector Cum District Magistrate, Samastipur. 3.

The Additional Collector, Samastipur.

4.

The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Rosera, District- Samastipur. 5.

The Circle Officer, Singhia, District- Samastipur. 6.

Sanjay Das, S/o Ramsagar Das Resident of Village- Salempur, P.O. Salempur, P.S.- Singhia, Sub-Division- Rosera, District- Samastipur. 7.

Smt. Renu Singh, W/o Sri Anil Kumar Singh Resident of VillageManguwar, P.S. and P.O.- Basnahi, District- Saharsa. 8.

Smt. Priyanka Devi, W/o Sri Ajit Kumar Singh Resident of VillageHabidih, P.O. and P.S.- Baheri, District- Darbhanga. 9.

Kumar Pankaj, S/o Late Satyabrat Singh Resident of Village- Singhia, P.O.- Salempur, P.S.- Singhia, Anchal Snghia, Sub-Division- Rosera, DistrictSamastipur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjan Kumar Dubey, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Md. Khurshid Alam, (AAG-12) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 11-09-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. The present writ application has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 06.10.2022 passed by the Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Rosera in Mutation Appeal No. 31 of 2021. Counsel has also challenged the order dated

Patna High Court CWJC No.6610 of 2023(2) dt.11-09-2023 2/2 09.10.2021 passed by the Circle Officer, Singhia in Mutation Case No. 275 of 2021-22.

3. Learned counsel for the State has raised preliminary objection that the orders under challenge is revisable under the Bihar Mutation Act, 2011, [Bihar Act 23 of 2011].

4. In this background, this Court directs the petitioner to file the mutation revision before the appropriate authority under the Bihar Mutation Act, 2011 raising all the points which he has raised in the writ petition and the revision authority shall pass a reasoned and speaking order in revision, considering all those points which he has raised in the present writ petition.

5. The delay, if any in filing the revision is hereby condoned.

6. With this direction, the present writ application stands disposed of.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) sadique/- U