Domi Yadav And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41770 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -414 Year- 1997 Thana -COMPLAINT CASE District- SUPAUL ======================================================

1. Domi Yadav

2. Rajendra Yadav

3. Tarun Kumar Yadav @ Tarun Yadav, sons of Dukha Yadav

4. Fagu Yadav

5. Nand Kishore Yadav , both sons of Raghuni Yadav

6. Dayaram Mehta son of Late Chhedi Mehta, all resident of village Mirjaiwa, P.S. Tribeniganj, District Supaul.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

State of Bihar & Anr .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Yogendra Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioner nos. 5 and 6, namely, Nand Kishore Yadav and Dayaram Mehta have already been arrested and, thus, this application has become infructuous as against them. It is dismissed as such as against them.

Rest of the petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under sections 420 and 467 of the Indian Penal Code.

In view of the fact that the complaint case was

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41770 of 2016 (2) dt.23-09-2016 2/2 filed in the year 1997 and after almost 19 years, this anticipatory bail application has been filed, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in connection with Complaint Case No. 414-C of 1997 pending in the court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul.

However, the petitioners may surrender and pray for regular bail which will be considered on its own merit in accordance with law without being prejudiced by this order. (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J) Amin/- U