Yogendra Kumar Dube v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7999 of 2019 ====================================================== Yogendra Kumar Dube, aged about 31 years (Male), Son of Bachcha Dube, Resident of Village-Ward no.01 Ghevarahi Daunaha, Police Station-Dhanaha, District-West Champaran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Excise and Prohibition Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Excise Commissioner, Bihar, Patna.
3.
The District Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah. 4.
The Superintendent of Police, West Champaran at Bettiah. 5.
The Superintendent of Excise, West Champaran at Bettiah. 6.
The S.H.O. Dhanaha Police Station, District-West Champaran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Brij Kishor Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Vikash Kumar (SC11) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN) Date : 20-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the state.
The petitioner prays for provisional release of the four wheeler vehicle (Hyundai) bearing Registration No. BR22AE2678, Chasis No. MALA251ALHM577675, Engine No. G3HAHM530368, which has been seized in connection with Dhanaha P.S. Case No. 38 of 2019 for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 37(b) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
Patna High Court CWJC No.7999 of 2019 dt.20-06-2019 2/3 It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that confiscation proceeding is yet to be initiated and the vehicle is lying under the open sky in the police station. The seizure list reflects the seizure of 1⁄2 liter of Beer.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking note of the nature of seizure made as well as the fact that the confiscation proceeding is yet to be initiated, we direct that the vehicle in question be released provisionally in favour of the petitioner on production of ownership and registration with respect to vehicle in question in his name before the designated Court below with two sureties to the extent of the value of the vehicle as indicated in the insurance document. The petitioner while submitting the sureties shall also furnish the following affidavits/undertakings:
(i) That the vehicle in question has never been involved in any offence of similar nature in past and shall not indulge in similar offence in future.
(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in creating any third party right or interest in respect of the vehicle during the pendency of the confiscation proceeding, if any, and shall not alienate the vehicle during this period.
(iii) The petitioner shall furnish an undertaking to
Patna High Court CWJC No.7999 of 2019 dt.20-06-2019 3/3 produce the vehicle before the confiscating authority as and when required.
(iv) Prior to release of the vehicle, a Panchanama would be got prepared by the designated Court below, wherein the photograph of the vehicle shall be taken and will be certified by the petitioner and the same shall be kept on record so that in future, if so required, it may be used as a secondary evidence. The petitioner shall furnish an undertaking not to challenge the said Panchanama in course of trial.
The release shall be allowed within a period of 14 days from the date of submission of the sureties and the undertakings as stated above. This release of the vehicle would, however, be subject to initiation and finalization of the confiscation proceeding.
With the observations/directions above, this writ petition is allowed.
(Jyoti Saran, J) ( Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Nasimul/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 27-06-2019 Transmission Date N/A