Belal Ahamad @ Md. Belal @ Md. Belal Ahamad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30578 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-893 Year-2023 Thana- ARA NAGAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Belal Ahamad @ Md. Belal @ Md. Belal Ahamad Son of Late Md. Nejamuddin @ Md. Nezamuddin Resident of Village- Abarpul Ara, P.S- Ara Town, Dist- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ravindra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 21-09-2024 1.
Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2.
This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Ara Nagar PS case no. 893 of 2023, disclosing offences punishable under Section 307 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code.
3.
The prosecution story, as per the First Information Report, is that the informant was constructing a house on her own land. On 31.10.2023, petitioner along with 12-15 persons came and threatened the workers to stop the work, otherwise they would be killed. They also demanded Rs. 1 lac as extortion money.
4.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30578 of 2024(3) dt.21-09-2024 2/2 petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence in the manner alleged. Learned counsel further submits that there is no eye-witness to the occurrence and petitioner has been implicated in this case on the basis of suspicion only. He next submits that no any empty cartridge has been recovered from the petitioner. The petitioner is stated to be accused in 09 cases. 5.
Regard being had to the submissions made on behalf of the parties and taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is accused in 09 cases under various sections of Indian Penal Code and Arms Act, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6.
This application is, accordingly, dismissed.
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) rinkee/- U T