Akhilesh Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28473 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-22 Year-2025 Thana- BHARGAMA District- Araria ====================================================== 1.

Akhilesh Paswan S/O Ratan Paswan Resident of Gamahariya, Sirsiya Kala, Ward no. 14, P.S.- Bhargama, Dist.- Araria.

2.

Sangita Devi W/O Akhilesh Paswan Resident of Gamahariya, Sirsiya Kala, Ward no. 14, P.S.- Bhargama, Dist.- Araria.

3.

Sitam Kumar Paswan @ Sitam Paswan S/O Ramnath Paswan @ Ramnath @ Khokhan Paswan Resident of Gamahariya, Sirsiya Kala, Ward no. 14, P.S.- Bhargama, Dist.- Araria.

4.

Amrendra Paswan @ Amrendra Kumar Paswan S/O Ram Pravesh Paswan Resident of Gamahariya, Sirsiya Kala, Ward no. 14, P.S.- Bhargama, Dist.- Araria.

5.

Nakku Paswan @ Virendra Paswan S/O Ram Pravesh Paswan Resident of Gamahariya, Sirsiya Kala, Ward no. 14, P.S.- Bhargama, Dist.- Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kumar Ravish For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dilip Kumar No. 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 07-05-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 137(2), 96 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and petitioner No. 2 is woman and the informant alleges that her daughter had gone to school on 18-1-2025, but she did not return, accordingly a search was made, but then the victim was not found and the informant came to know that her daughter was seen with Raushan Paswan.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28473 of 2025(2) dt.07-05-2025 2/2 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners next submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case, being father, mother and cousin brothers of Raushan. It is further submitted that the victim came back and her statement was recorded under Section 183 BNSS and she did not support the case of the prosecution and disclosed her age as 18 years. 5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Bhargama P.S. Case No. 22 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T