Ramdeo Yadav And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.52086 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1000 Year- 2012 Thana -MADHEPURA COMPALINT CASE District- MADHEPURA ======================================================
1. Ramdeo Yadav
2. Radhe Yadav
3. Kumar Yadav
4. Jogen Yadav @ Yogendra Yadav
5. Shiben Yadav All sons of Duni Yadav
6. Sita Devi wife of Ramdeo Yadav
7. Arun Devi wife of Radhe Yadav
8. Rekha Devi wife of Kumar Yadav
9. Nanhaki Devi Daughter of Rahde Yadav
10. Rambadan Yadav son of Sukhadeo Yadav
11. Teniya Devi wife of Rambadan Yadav
12. Shambhu Yadav @ Shambhu Yadav son of Rambadan Yadav
13. Sagar Yadav son of Sukhadeo Yadav
14. Lalo Yadav son of Anant Yadav
15. Sita Devi wife of Lalo Yadav All are residents of village - Tengraha P.S. - Shankarpur, District - Madhepura.
.... .... Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Kendula Devi @ Rodhi Devi wife of Shyam Sundar Yadav resident of village - Tengraha, P.S. Shankarpur, District - Madhepura. .... .... Opposite Partys ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Partys : Mr. Sri Satya Nand Shukla (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 21-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner prays for anticipatory bail in connection with complaint case no. 1000 of 2012 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379 and other sections of the Indian Penal Code.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52086 of 2016 (2) dt.21-12-2016 2/2 There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners except petitioner no.1 who is alleged to be order- giver. It has been submitted on behalf of petitioner that prior to the filing of this case, a case has been lodged by the petitioner against the informant and others and F.I.R. of that case has been annexed as Annexure-3 of the petition. Further, there was title suit going on between the parties of the case. Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and considering the fact that there is no specific allegation against any of the petitioner and that the land dispute is going on between the parties, let the abovenamed petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Rs. Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in connection with complaint case no. 1000 of 2012 subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J.) rinkee/- U T