Dhalo Mandal @ Rajiv Mandal v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.6077 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -142 Year- 2017 Thana -CHAUSA District- MADHEPURA ======================================================
1. Dhalo Mandal @ Rajiv Mandal, S/o Late Ganesh Mandal, Resident of Village- Dhane Mane Dih, P.S. Chausa (Fulaut O.P.), District- Madhepur. .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sunil Kumar Thakur, Adv. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Dr. Ajeet Kumar, APP 94 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 17-02-2018 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Chausa P.S. Case No. 142 of 2017 for offence under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
In this case vide order, dated 02.02.2018, case diary was called for.
The learned Additional Public Prosecutor with reference paragraph 52 of the case diary has submitted that the name of this petitioner along with Dinesh Mandal, Prakash Mandal, Sarpanch Mandal surfaced out of the persons named in paragraph 52. Dinesh Mandal, Prakash Mandal, Sarpanch Mandal have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 46587 of 2017 vide order, dated 13.11.2017. The case of the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6077 of 2018 (3) dt.17-02-2018 2/2 petitioner stands on similar footing.
In paragraph 3 of the petition there is specific statement on affidavit that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, hence, on the ground of parity the Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender, within one month from the date of receipt of this order, is directed to be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Chausa P.S. Case No. 142 of 2017 to the satisfaction of the Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, Udakishunganj, Madhepura, or successor Court, subject to the condition enumerated in Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) SA/- U T