Ramadhar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37409 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-81 Year-2020 Thana- KANGLI District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.

RAMADHAR YADAV Son of Late Harilal Yadav Resident of VillageSugaha Bhawanipur, P.S.- Kangali, District- West Champaran. 2.

Krishnawati Devi @ Radhika Devi Wife of Ramadhar Yadav Resident of Village- Sugaha Bhawanipur, P.S.- Kangali, District- West Champaran. 3.

Satendra Yadav Son of Ramadhar Yadav Resident of Village- Sugaha Bhawanipur, P.S.- Kangali, District- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar No 7, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Akshay Lal Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Learned Counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 363, 366(A), 379, 504, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8 of POCSO Act. Allegation is that the petitioners abducted the daughter of the informant.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37409 of 2021(2) dt.09-03-2022 2/2 tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. The victim has been recovered. Her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. has been recorded, in which she has stated that she had left the house out of her own will. There is no allegation of abduction. Petitioner No.2 is a lady.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the complaint case/F.I.R.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 7th Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (POCSO), Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Kangali P.S. case No.81 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T