Rubi Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2730 of 2011 ====================================================== Rubi Kumari W/O Rabindra Sardar , D/O Anant Lal Sardar Resident Of Village - Charney (BAIDHNATHPUR) P.S. - Triveniganj (PANCHAYAT Simariya) District-Supaul (BIHAR).
... ... Petitioner/S
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary Department Of Human Resources Development , Govt. Of Bihar , Patna.
2. The Director , Department Of Primary Education , Govt. Of Bihar , Patna.
3. The District Magistrate , Supaul .
4. The District Superintendent Of Education , Supaul.
5. The Block Development Officer , Triveniganj , District- Supaul.
6. The Block Education Extension Officer , Triveniganj, District- Supaul.
7. The Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj Simaria , Block Triveniganj , DistrictSupaul.
8. The Panchayat Secretary Gram Panchayat Raj Simaria , Block-Triveniganj , District-Supaul.
9. Kumari Meena D/O Parmeshwar Sardar , W/O Gulab Kishore Village And Post-Laxminia , P.S.- Baliz Bazar , District-Supaul , At Present VillageJhumaria , Post - Kumyahi , P.S.- Triveniganj , District- Supaul. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 06-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
In view of the fact that the State Appellate Authority is now functional, the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition in order to file an appeal before the State Appellate Authority.
Permission is granted.
Patna High Court CWJC No.2730 of 2011 dt.06-09-2018 2/2 In case the petitioner files an appeal before the State Appellate Authority within a period of one month from today along with a copy of this order, the State Appellate Authority is required to decide the appeal on its own merit after condoning the delay in filing the appeal in view of the fact that the petitioner was pursuing the writ petition for the same relief before this Court. With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) spandey/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 07.09.2018 Transmission Date