← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./26658/2025bail granted

Jeewan Kishore Jha @ Jiwan Kishore Jha v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-29Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26658 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-142 Year-2021 Thana- BAHADURPUR District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Jeewan Kishore Jha @ Jiwan Kishore Jha Son of Late Raghubir Jha VillageSobhepatti Ps -Ashok paper mill (A.P.M.) Dist -Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Baidyanath Prasad For the State :

Mr.Syed Ehteshamuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 29-08-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2. This is an application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 307 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code, registered in connection with Bahadurpur P.S.Case No. 142 of 2021.

3. According to allegation, the accused persons started uprooting the standing crops from the land of the informant. When he prohibited, they badly assaulted the informant and his son. The specific allegation against the petitioner is that he inflicted katta blow on the head of the informant's son, who suffered grievous injury in his head.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the land mentioned by the informant is the purchased land of the petitioner. As a matter of fact, his father had purchased that land from the mother of the informant in the year 1989. Despite that, the members of the prosecution side were

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26658 of 2025(3) dt.29-08-2025 2/2 disturbing the possession of the petitioner. His further submission is that the petitioner has remained in custody for five and half months.

5. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the informant has opposed the prayer for bail by submitting that the petitioner did not go to the police station with the relevant papers of the land in dispute to show his bona fide right.

6. Considering the above facts and circumstances and also the fact that the petitioner has remained in custody for five and half months, let the petitioner, above-named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-I, Darbhanga, in connection with Bahadurpur P.S.Case No. 142 of 2021, subject to the following condition that the petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) HR/- U T