← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./7254/2018bail granted

Rajendra Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

2018-02-09Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.7254 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-632 Year-2017 Thana- BODHGAYA District- Gaya ====================================================== Rajendra Manjhi S/o Saheb Manjhi, R/o Village- Jai Prakash Nagar, P.S.- Bodh Gaya, District- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

SMT. ANUSUIYA JAISWAL ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a)/30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 6 liters mahua wine and 45 kg mahua flower are recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has transpired as the alleged recovery has been made from the joint house of the petitioner. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. It is alleged that 6 liters mahua

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7254 of 2018(2) dt.09-02-2018 2/2 wine and 20 kg mahua flower is recovered from the joint house of the petitioner as per seizure list. Apart from this, 25 kg mahua flower is recovered from the shop of Basudeo Yadav. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Gaya in connection with Bodh Gaya P.S. case No.632 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Narendra/- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T