Abhinadan Kumar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.23423 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-693 Year-2017 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul ======================================================
1. Abhinadan Kumar, S/o Ranjit Paswan,
2. Kundan Paswan @ Kundan Kumar, S/o Taranand Paswan Both are resident of Village- Chainsingh Patti, P.S.- Supaul, DistrictSupaul. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Madan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 19-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.
The petitioners apprehend arrest in Supaul P.S. Case No. 693 of 2017, G.R. No. 2524 of 2017, instituted for the offence under Sections 341,323,354A,354B,504,506 of the IPC. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that they have clean antecedent.
In the written report, there is allegation that these petitioners came in front of the informant while she was going for tuition and told that they love her and also gave threat to kidnap her.
Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that there is false allegation against these petitioners as they are students.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23423 of 2018(2) dt.19-04-2018 2/2 There is no mention of date, time and place of occurrence in the written report.
In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners, named above, in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 693 of 2017, G.R. No. 2524 of 2017, to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Supaul, subject to condition as laid down u/S 438 (2) of the Cr. P.C.
with further conditions (1) (bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every dated fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bonds of the petitioners and (3) if the petitioners tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.