Patna High CourtCR. MISC./49405/2016bail granted

Santosh Mehta @ Santosh Kumar @ Santosh Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2017-03-23Mr. Justice Birendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.49405 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -16 Year- 2016 Thana -DEOKUND District- AURANGABAD ======================================================

1. Santosh Mehta @ Santosh Kumar @ Santosh Mahto S/o Ram Janam Mahto resident of Village - Maharajganj, P.S. - Deokund, District - Aurangabad .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Bhaskar Shankar, Adv. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma, APP 31 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 23-03-2017 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

This is a petition for grant of anticipatory bail for offence under Sections 402, 406 and 409 of the Indian Penal Code.

By order, dated 09.12.2016, three months' time was allowed, on the prayer of the petitioner, so that the petitioner could pay the entire dues amount.

A supplementary affidavit has been filed stating therein that the petitioner has paid only rupees three lakhs uptill now and the rest amount of rupees thirty-two lakhs and odd, he would pay within next eight months.

Considering the aforesaid fact, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender, within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, be released on furnishing bail bond of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49405 of 2016 (3) dt.23-03-2017 2/2 Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Deokund P.S. Case No. 16 of 2016 to the satisfaction of the Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, or successor Court, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and the Court below shall monitor the undertaking of the petitioner of refund of remain amount within time frame, failing which the Court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

(Birendra Kumar, J) SA/- U √ T √