← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./37383/2021bail granted

J.P. @ Jai Prakash @ Jai Prakash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2021-10-07Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37383 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-201 Year-2020 Thana- MOKAMAH District- Patna ====================================================== J.P. @ JAI PRAKASH @ JAI PRAKASH KUMAR Son of Late Nakat Mahto @ Nakat Das Resident of Village- Coal Saiding, P.S.- Pachmahla, DistrictPatna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amit Kumar Anand For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Renu Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-10-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of eight weeks.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence under Section-30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. The prosecution case, in short, is that 856.320 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is alleged that 856.320 liters wine is recovered from house of the co-accused. The

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37383 of 2021(2) dt.07-10-2021 2/2 name of the petitioner has transpired in this case on the basis of secret information. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in the present case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise Act, Patna in connection with Special Case No. 5745 of 2021 arising out of Mokama P.S. Case No. 201 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V.//- U T