Uma Shankar Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20064 of 2014 ======================================================
1. Uma Shankar Singh, Son of Late Kishun Mahto.
2. Ram Ishwar Singh, son of Late Sukh Lal Singh, Both residence of Village-Sahjauli, Tola Mahal Dava, P.O.-Dava, Police Station, Jugdishpur, District- Bhojpur.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Collector Bhojpur.
2. The Additional District Magistrate Bhojpur.
3. The Deputy Collector Land Reforms Jugdishpur Dist- Bhojpur.
4. The Circle Officer Jugdishpur, District- Bhojpur.
5. Pradeep Kumar Vidyarthi, son of Girja Nand Prasad Mother name is Sita Devi residence of village + P.O.- Navada, Police Station- Navada Ara, District-Bhojpur.
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent nos.1to4 : Mr. Nikhil Kr.Agrawal, AC to GP-9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 22-10-2016 Despite repeated calls, none appears on behalf of the petitioners in support of the present writ petition, though the name of the learned counsel appearing on their behalf is printed in the daily cause list.
The learned State counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent nos.1 to 4 submits that the reliefs sought for on behalf of the petitioners in the present writ petition are completely misconceived and the writ petition is fit to be dismissed, as the matter is still pending before the appellate authority. Be that as it may, since none is appearing on behalf of the petitioners, the writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
Arvind/- (Birendra Prasad Verma, J) U