Rajnath Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20203 of 2014 ====================================================== Rajnath Yadav Son of Late Anhach Yadav, Resident of Village- Partapur, P.S. Goh, District Aurangabad Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya 3.

The District Magistrate cum- Collector, Aurangabad Bihar 4.

The Superintendent of Police, Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad Bihar 5.

The Anchal Adhikari, Goh Block, District Aurangabad Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Kr Singh No. 6 For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Ram Balak Mahto, Adv, ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 09-08-2023 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1. That this is an application for issuance of appropriate writ(s)/direction(s) for quashing of the order contained in Memo No.296 dated 4.11.2013 of the respondent no.3 and also vide service appeal no.269/14 an order dated 18.9.2014 of the respondent no.2, whereby and whereunder two punishments have been awarded to the petitioner which are as follows:- (I) The increments with cumulative effect of the petitioner is stopped of.

(ii) Except substance allowance nothing shall be paid to the petitioner for his suspension period. Further the respondents be directed not to stop any

Patna High Court CWJC No.20203 of 2014(2) dt.09-08-2023 2/2 increment of the petitioner or and he be paid full salary for suspension period i.e. for the period from 4.2.1997 to 4.10.2004 with interest rate after deduction what has been paid to him as subsistence allowance."

Realizing the fact that the petitioner had failed to file appeal within the time limit prescribed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court, by an order dated 06.08.2014, passed in CWJC No.3847 of 2014, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to first get the time limit, as fixed by a coordinate Bench of this Court, extended and then take recourse to such alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law for redressal of his aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.

The writ petition stands disposed off as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) sonal/- U