Resham Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 17177 of 2011 ====================================================== Resham Kumari, W/o Soman Kumar, R/o Village - Dhusar Kali Asthan Tola, PS - Rupauli, Distt - Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Govt of Bihar, Patna 3.

The Director, ICDS (Integrated Child Development Scheme) Directorate, Social Welfare Deptt, Bihar, Patna 4.

The Commissioner, Purnea Division, Purnea 5.

The District Magistrate, Purnea 6.

The District Program Officer, Purnea 7.

The Child Development Project Officer (CDPO), Rupauli, Purnea 8.

Ritu Kumari Devi, W/o Shashi Bhushan, R/o Village - Dhusar, PS - Tikapatti, PO - Tikapatti, Via - Kurshela, Distt - Purnea ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

N O N E For the S t a t e :

Mr Alok Kumar Rahi, AC to AAG IV ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 14-10-2019 Writ petition has been filed seeking a declaration that the petitioner is entitled to be selected as Angan Bari Sevika for Center No 19 of Laxmipur Charapatti Gram Panchayat in the district of Purnea. The petitioner has assailed the selection of respondent No 8 Ritu Kumari Devi.

Learned State Counsel submits that CWJC No 13161 of 2010, which was filed by respondent No 8 in respect of the same selection process, has been dismissed by this Court with a direction to the Child Development Project Officer to

Patna High Court CWJC No.17177 of 2011(3) dt.14-10-2019 2/2 implement the order of District Magistrate as well as the Commissioner dated 15.07.2010 and 16.08.2010 respectively. In view of such order having been passed in the other writ proceedings at the instance of respondent No 8 of the instant proceedings, now nothing survives for adjudication. None appears for the petitioner.

Without going into the merits of the submission advanced by the learned State Counsel, writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./- U