Kallu Saw @ Kallu Kumar @ Akash Kumar @ Kallu Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.24142 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -91 Year- 2018 Thana -DEHRI TOWN District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================
1. Kallu Saw @ Kallu Kumar @ Akash Kumar @ Kallu Sah, Son of Sanjay Saw @ Sanjay Prasad, resident of Village- Mohan Vigaha, P.S.- Dehri Nagar, District- Rohtas.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Kumar Ranjit Ranjan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 03-05-2018 Heard the parties.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Dehri nagar P.S.Case no.91 of 2018 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 326, 307, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Petitioner is named in the FIR and there is allegation of assault against the petitioner and other accused persons. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that except his name is mentioned as member of the mob, no allegation has been attributed against him.
No one appears on behalf of the State.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24142 of 2018 (2) dt.03-05-2018 2/2 circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Dehri Nagar P.S.Case No.91 of 2018, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make himself available as and when required by the Police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond. With the aforesaid direction, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T