Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41531/2017bail granted

Prince Kumar @ Prince Kumar Singh v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-09-15Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41531 of 2017 (2) dt.15-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41531 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -770 Year- 2014 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPATNA ======================================================

1. Prince Kumar @ Prince Kumar Singh, Son of Shatrudhan Singh, Resident of Village- Chotaka Rajpur, P.S.- Simari, District- Buxar. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Ranjana Devi, Wife of Prince Kumar, Daughter of Surendra Singh, Resident of Village- Ghora Tap, P.S.- Bihta, District- Patna. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Madhuri Lata ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case instituted under Sections 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The case is triable by the Magistrate. Due to petty family dispute, the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41531 of 2017 (2) dt.15-09-2017 present case has been instituted against the petitioner. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this court, in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Complaint Case No.770C of 2014, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Danapur, Patna, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Amit/- U T