Radha Kishun Ram v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16437 of 2013 ====================================================== Radha Kishun Ram Son Of Late Puchahi Ram Resident Of Village Saktauli, P.O. Jagtauli, P.S.- Bhore, District Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and Ors G-9, Ali Yavar Jang Marg, Bandra East, Mumbai- 400051 2.

The Chairman, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Null G-9, Ali Yavar Jang Marg, Bandra East, Mumbai- 400051 3.

The General Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Bihar State Office, Loknayak Bhawan Frazer Road, Patna 4.

The Chief Area Manager, Lpg, Indian Oil Coporation Limited, Shahi Bhavan Exhibition Road, Patna 5.

The Area Manager, Lpg, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Shahi Bhavan Exhibition Road, Patna 6.

The Manager Lpg Rgglv, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Shahi Bhawan Exhibition Road, Patna 7.

The State Of Bihar, Through The Collector Cum District Magistrate, Gopalganj The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Hathua, District Gopalganj 8.

The Circle Officer, Bhore, District Gopalganj 9.

Rakesh Kumar Ram S/O Ram Lochan Ram Resident Of Village Saktauli, P.O. Jagtauli, P.S.- Bhore, District Gopalganj ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dr. Ranjeet Kumar, Advocate Mr. Kanishk Kaustubh, Advocate For the Respondent No. 10 :

Mr. Rajendra Prasad, Advocate For the I.O.C.L.

:

Mr. Sanat Kumar Mishra, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ORAL ORDER 28-03-2023 It is informed that the allocation of L.P.G. distributorship stands already commissioned on 22.05.2014 by the respondent No. 9. It is also informed that the petitioner Radha Kishun Ram has expired on 03.10.2015. The L.R.s of the petitioner have not been brought on record.

Patna High Court CWJC No.16437 of 2013(3) dt.28-03-2023 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner pleads no instruction.

Keeping in view the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous by the efflux of time.

(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J) Sachin/- Item No. 73 U