Aman Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Govt Of Bihar, Patna And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.117 of 2016 (Arising out of Khodwandpur P.S. Case No.153 of 2015, pending in the Court of S.D.J. M., Begusarai) ====================================================== Aman Kumar, son of Dayanand Yadav, resident of village-Purpathar, P.S.- Khodawandpur (Chhaurahi O.P.), District-Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Home Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, District-Begusarai.

4. The Superintendent of Police, District-Begusarai.

5. The Officer-in-Charge, Khodawandpur Police Station, Begusarai.

6. Rajesh Kumar Rai, son of Bishwanath Prasad Rai, resident of Village Gauridih, Ward No.9, P.S. Khodawandpur, District-Begusarai.

7. Nandini Kumar, wife of Aman Kumar, daughter of Rajesh Kumar Rai, resident of Village-Purpathar, P.S. Khodawandpur, District-Begusarai.

8. The Superintendent, Women Remand Home, Gaighat, Patna, DistrictPatna. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Yogesh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Prabhu Narayan Sharma, A.C. to A.G. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ) 02-02-2016 Heard Mr. Yogesh Kumar, learned Counsel, appearing for the petitioner, and Mrs. Prabhu Narayan Sharma, learned Assistant Counsel to Advocate General, appearing for the respondents.

After some arguments, Mr. Yogesh Kumar, learned Counsel, appearing for the petitioner, seeks permission to

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.117 of 2016 (2) dt.02-02-2016 2/2 withdraw this application with liberty to approach the competent authority with appropriate application, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. No objection has been raised by the respondents to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this writ application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J) Sunil/- U T