← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./30977/2024bail granted

Hareram Singh @ Hareram Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-25Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30977 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-101 Year-2024 Thana- UDWANTNAGAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== 1.

Hareram Singh @ Hareram Kumar son of Lal Babu Singh R/village - Asni PS - Udawantnagar Dist- Bhojpur 2.

Pankaj Singh @ Bheda @ Pankaj Kumar Singh son of Ram Bahadur Singh R/village- Asni PS- Udawantnagar Dist- Bhojpur 3.

Pappu Singh @ Pappu Kumar son of Late Badri Singh R/village- Asni PSUdawantnagar Dist- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Prabhat Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Pronoti Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 25-04-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent.

4. Allegation is of recovery of 176 litres of liquor from the bank of Babas river.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners were not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from their conscious possession and even the alleged recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioners and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30977 of 2024(2) dt.25-04-2024 2/2 is accessible to public at large and they came to be implicated based on the secret information which is the easiest way to implicate someone when petitioners admittedly are persons with clean antecedent.

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

7. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Udawantnagar P.S. Case No. 101 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

8. However, the learned trial court, before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioners, shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and if it is found that petitioners have antecedent of even one case in that event the present anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect to.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T