Dharmvir Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28655 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-214 Year-2021 Thana- BELHAR District- Banka ====================================================== 1.

DHARMVIR YADAV Son of Ram Prit Yadav Resident of Village - Nagel, P.S. - Belhar, District - Banka (Bihar).

2.

Hanuman Yadav son of Ramprit Yadav Resident of Village - Nagel, P.S. - Belhar, District - Banka (Bihar).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anuj Kumar Shrivastava, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 15-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent. The informant alleges that on 27.06.2021 his father had gone to graze cattle when he was surrounded by the accused persons including the petitioners and on order of Sinku Yadav accused Pinku Yadav and Shishupal Yadav shot his father dead. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that from

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28655 of 2022(2) dt.15-11-2022 2/2 bare perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that on order of Sinku Yadav, Pinku Yadav and Shishupal Yadav fired causing death of the father of the informant. It is further submitted that as far as petitioners are concerned, they are not roped with any allegation of firing or assault but have been implicated alleging that they were also present at the place of occurrence.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Belhar P.S. Case No. 214 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T