Patna High CourtCR. MISC./44427/2017rejected

Vishwakarma Ram And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-21Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.44427 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-179 Year-2016 Thana- PIPRA District- East Champaran ======================================================

1. Vishwakarma Ram son of Deep Ram

2. Paras nath Ram son of Bigan Ram @ Chandrika Ram

3. Bhrigu Nath Ram @ Bhrigu Nath Dev son of Vishwakarma Ram

4. Pintu Ram @ Santosh Mohan Dev son of Vishwakarma Ram All R/o village- Kunwarpur, P.s.- Pipra, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Madhurendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. SRI KALYAN SHANKAR ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 21-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Pipra P. S. Case No. 179 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, when the informant with his grand mother and younger brother were returning after offering Puja, the petitioner no. 1 started assaulting the informant with bamboo, thereafter, all the petitioners started assaulting him and snatched Rs. 6500/- and also a gold chain and after causing threats released the informant.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44427 of 2017(2) dt.21-09-2017 2/2 Submission is of false implication and that the son of the petitioner no. 1 has lodged case bearing Chakiya SC/ST P. S. Case No. 85 of 2016 and as such the petitioners who have been falsely implicated in this case deserve sympathetic consideration.

Learned APP opposes the prayer of pre-arrest bail by submitting that this case has been lodged on 01.11.2016 whereas Chakiya P. S. Case No. 85 of 2016 has been lodged on 23.11.2016 i.e. after 22 days only with a view to put pressure. In the facts and circumstances stated above, this Court is not inclined to grant privilege of pre-arrest bail to the petitioners and accordingly, their such prayer stands rejected. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T