Nirnimesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1052 of 2026 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2738 of 2026 ====================================================== Nirnimesh Kumar Son of Kapeshwar Prasad Singh, Presently residing at House No 80, Siddharth Niketan, Sector 14, Kaushambi, Sahibabad, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh 201010, Permanent Address Village Mor, PS Mokama, District Patna, Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar Patna. 2.

Union of India, through Principal Secretary, Ministry of Railways, Government of India.

3.

Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

Urban Development and Housing Department, through the Principal Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5.

Commissioner, Patna Division, District- Patna. 6.

District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Patna.

7.

District Land Acquisition Officer, Patna.

8.

The Administrator, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Authority, Patna, Bihar. 9.

Circle Officer, Sadar, District- Patna.

10.

The General Manager, East Central Railway, Hajipur, Vaishali, Bihar 844101.

11.

The Divisional Railway Manager, Danapur Division, East Central Railway, DRM Office, Danapur, Patna, Bihar 801105.

12.

Chief Engineer, Project Director, Neura-Daniyawa Railway Line Project. 13.

District Treasury Officer, Patna, Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ankit Griyaghey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Binita Singh, SC-28 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-05-2026 Heard Mr. Ankit Griyaghey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mrs. Binita Singh, learned AC to GP-6 for the State.

2/4

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks modification of the order judgment dated 19.02.2026 passed in CWJC No. 2738 of 2026 to the extent that in Paragraph No. 10 of the judgment, in place of "It is admitted position that the petitioner has received the Award in the year 2025 under protest", it has been inadvertently typed as "It is admitted position that the petitioner has received the Award in the year 2014 under protest" and in paragraph no.

14 of the judgment, in place of "The District Magistrate is directed to consider the records relating to land acquisition, particularly the date of possession and the MVR notified by the State Government, as in the year 2014, the petitioner had received the award under protest in the year 2025 and redress the claim of the petitioner well within a period of six weeks in accordance with law from the date of communication of this order."

it has inadvertently been typed as "The District Magistrate is directed to consider the records relating to land acquisition, particularly the date of possession and the MVR notified by the State Government, as in the year 2014, the petitioner had received the award under protest and redress the claim of the petitioner well within a period of six weeks in accordance with law from the date of communication of this order."

3/4

3. Considering the aforesaid submission, I find it proper to delete "It is admitted position that the petitioner has received the Award in the year 2014 under protest" from Paragraph No. 10 of the judgment dated 19.02.2026 and the same be substituted in paragraph no. 10 by "It is admitted position that the petitioner has received the Award in the year 2025 under protest" and "The District Magistrate is directed to consider the records relating to land acquisition, particularly the date of possession and the MVR notified by the State Government, as in the year 2014, the petitioner had received the award under protest and redress the claim of the petitioner well within a period of six weeks in accordance with law from the date of communication of this order." from Paragraph No. 14 of the judgment dated 19.02.

2026 and the same be substituted in paragraph no. 14 by "The District Magistrate is directed to consider the records relating to land acquisition, particularly the date of possession and the MVR notified by the State Government, as in the year 2014, the petitioner had received the award under protest in the year 2025 and redress the claim of the petitioner well within a period of six weeks in accordance with law from the date of communication of this order."

4/4

4. Accordingly, the judgment dated 19.02.2026 passed in CWJC No. 2738 of 2026 is modified to the aforesaid extent. The other parts of the judgment shall remain intact.

5. The modification application stands disposed of. (Purnendu Singh, J) Niraj/- U