Suresh Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CIVIL REVIEW No.88 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6715 of 2021 ====================================================== Suresh Singh son of Late Nathuni Singh, Resident of Village- Suhaigajan, P.O. Suhai Sahpur, P.S. Baniyapur, District- Saran at Chapra. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna. 2.
The Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development (Department of Education), Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 3.
The Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms, now known as Department of General Administration, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.
4.
The Director, Secondary Education, Department of Human Resources Development (Department of Education), Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.
5.
The Director, Mass Education (Jan Shiksha)-cum- Additional Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development (Department of Education), Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.
6.
The Director (Administration)-cum- Additional Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development (Department of Education), Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.
7.
The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Saran Division, District- Saran at Chapra.
8.
The District Magistrate/ Collector, Saran, District- Saran at Chapra. 9.
The District Education Officer, Saran, District- Saran at Chapra. 10.
The District Mass Education (Jan Shiksha) Officer, Saran, District- Saran at Chapra.
11.
The District Programme Officer (Establishment) Saran, District- Saran at Chapra.
12.
The District Programme Officer (Literacy), Saran, District- Saran at Chapra. 13.
The District Programme Officer (Planning and Account), Saran, DistrictSaran at Chapra. 14.
The District Treasury Officer, Saran, District- Saran at Chapra. 15.
The Principal, Vishweshwar Seminary, Chapra Town, District- Saran at Chapra.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.S.B.K. Mangalam, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ajay Kumar Rastogi (Aag 10) For the State :
Mr.Prabhat Ranjan Singh, AC to AAG-15 ======================================================
Patna High Court C. REV. No.88 of 2022(2) dt.27-07-2022 2/2 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ORAL ORDER 27-07-2022 Heard the parties.
Learned counsel for the petitioners that subsequent to the passing of the order under review, this Court has passed a judgment which can be applied to the facts of the present case and, therefore, the order of referring the matter to the District Appellate Authority/State Appellate Authority in terms of Suresh Ram, deserves to be recalled.
I have considered the submissions.
No case is made out.
This writ petition is dismissed as accordingly. (Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J) Sadique/- Item No. 67 U