Pappu Kumar@ Pappu Sahni v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30291 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-111 Year-2024 Thana- TAJPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1.
Pappu Kumar@ Pappu Sahni Son Of Ganaur Sahni Resident Of VillageLarua Ward No. 02, Ps- Halai OP, Dist- Samastipur 2.
Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Sahni Son Of Ganaur Sahni Resident Of VillageLarua Ward No. 02, Ps- Halai OP, Dist- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 22-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners seek bail in Tajpur P.S. Case No. 111 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, 50.04 liters liquor was recovered from car and both the petitioners were apprehended on spot.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material have been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30291 of 2024(2) dt.22-04-2024 2/2 have got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. It is further submitted that the petitioners were driver and co-driver of the seized vehicle and they have no knowledge regarding the goods loaded in the vehicle. The petitioners are in custody since 16.03.2024 and have got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 100 of Cr.P.C.
5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.
7. Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Tajpur P.S. Case No. 111 of 2024.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T