Mostt. Maya Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6233 of 2023 ====================================================== Mostt. Maya Devi Wife of Surendra Bhagat @ Surendra Prasad Jaiswal, Resident of Village-School Tola Malpur, P.O.-Mohanpur, P.S.-Rupauli, District-Purnea.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna. 2.

The Inspector General of Registration, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Assistant Inspector General of Registration, Purnea. 4.

The District Registrar of Registration, Purnea, District-Purnea. 5.

The Dy. Collector, land Reform, Dhamdaha, District-Purnea. 6.

The Dy. Collector, Land Reform, Purnea, District-Purnea. 7.

The Under Registrar of Registration, Dhamdaha, District-Purnea. 8.

The S.D.O. Dhamdaha District-Purnea.

9.

Ashok Kumar Jaiswal Son of Lakshman Jaiswal, Resident of VillageMohanpur, Tola- Maldi, Pergana- Dharampur, P.S.-Rupauli, District-Purnea. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sandeep Jha, Adv.

Mr. Ved Prakash, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Manish Dhari Singh, AC to AG ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 30-10-2023 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1(i). For a direction to the concerned Registrar / Registration authority to give permission and direction to execute sale deed for the 95 decimal land, which detail is as follows:

These lands are situated at Mauja- Balia, Pargana Dharampur, P.S.- Rupauli, Thana no.293/1,

Patna High Court CWJC No.6233 of 2023(2) dt.30-10-2023 2/2 District- Rupauli which detail is:

Mauja Khata No.

Khesra No.

Area Ballia 335 part 280 part 15 Dec.

Ballia 335 part 280 part 40 Dec.

Ballia 335 part 280 part 40 Dec.

Ballia 335 part 280 part 40 Dec.

Total 95 Dec.

in favour of the petitioner by the Respondent no.9 for which she is legally entitled to the land in question."

2.

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law including that of filing a suit before the learned Civil Court having competent jurisdiction. Liberty, so sought, is granted. 3.

The writ petition stands disposed off as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U