Jay Karan Mahto @ Jai Karan Mahto v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.13572 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -224 Year- 2017 Thana -PANCHRUKHI District- SIWAN ======================================================

1. Jay Karan Mahto @ Jai Karan Mahto, Son of Late Dhuman Mahto, Resident of Village- Sarauti, Police Station- Pachrukhi, District- Siwan. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Hasim Mian, Son of Late Abdul Aziz, Resident of Village- Sarauti, P.S.- Pachrukhi, District- Siwan.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bijay Prakash Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Abhay Kumar Roy ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-04-2018 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Pachrukhi P.S. Case No. 224 of 2017, arising out of Complaint Case No. 1743 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 384, 386, 323, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of demand of extortion of Rs. 50,000/- from the informant while informant was constructing his house.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is Parshad of the area and as such he has falsely been made accused in this case at the instance of his political enemies. Further he has no criminal antecedent.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13572 of 2018 (2) dt.06-04-2018 2/2 before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM -VI, Siwan, in connection with Pachrukhi P.S. Case No. 224 of 2017, arising out of Complaint Case No. 1743 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T