Patna High CourtCR. MISC./46900/2017bail granted

Pradeep Kumar Dubey @ Pradip Dubey v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-09-22Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46900 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-37 Year-2017 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Katihar ====================================================== Pradeep Kumar Dubey @ Pradip Dubey S/o Kameshwar Dubey, R/o Labha, P.S. Pranpur, Distt. Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. Priyanka @ Priyanka Dubey w/o Pradip Dubey, R/o Lohiya Nagar, P.S. Katihar Town, Disttt. Katihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Bisheshwar Ram, APP For opposite party No.2 :

Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party No.2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46900 of 2017(2) dt.22-09-2017 2/2 Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the State and learned counsel for the opposite party No.2, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Katihar in connection with Katihar Mahila P.S. case No.37 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T