Aamod Ram @ Aamod Kumar Ram And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.41597 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -459 Year- 2015 Thana -MADHUBANI TOWN DistrictMADHUBANI ======================================================
1. Aamod Ram @ Aamod Kumar Ramm son of Parmeshwar Ram
2. Vikash Ram @ Surya Ram, S/o Arjun Ram Both are Resident of Village- Bhaura Ambedkar Nagar, Ward No. - 26, P.S.- Nagar Madhubani, District- Madhubani.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bimal Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 12-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Madhubani (Town) P.S. Case No. 459 of 2015 instituted for the offence under Sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that there is no recovery from possession of this petitioner. His name has surfaced in the confessional statement of co-accused Wasim who was arrested by the police. No recovery has been made from the petitioner. The First Information Report has been lodged by the informant against unknown alleging that theft has been committed in his house while he had gone to his native place in Durga Puja.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41597 of 2017 (3) dt.12-09-2017 2/2 Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Madhubani Town P.S. Case No. 459 of 2015, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions
(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T