Vinay Sao v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL REVISION No.817 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-1111 Thana- District- ====================================================== Vinay Sao son of Late Baijnath Prasad, Resident of Village- Chandhos, P.S.- Sigori, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar and Ors 2.

Vimal Kumar Gupta son of Late Ram Kishun Sao, Resident of VillageChandos, P.S. Sigori, District- Patna. 3.

Gurucharan @ Jaiprakash Gupta son of Late Ram Kisun Sao, Resident of Village- Chandhos, P.S.- Sigori, District- Patna. 4.

Vikash Kumar son of Gurucharan Singh @ Jaiprakash Gupta, Resident of Village- Chandhos, P.S.- Sigori, District- Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vinay Mistry, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sri Mukeshwar Dayal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 25-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Counsel for the petitioner has challenged the order dated 29.06.2017 passed under Section 107 of Cr.P.C. Counsel for State submits that the power of order under Section 107 of Cr.P.C. is valid for one year. Counsel for petitioner has no objection.

In this circumstances, the present revision petition is hereby dismissed as become infructuous.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) prakashmani/- U T