Nazam Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25683 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-52 Year-2019 Thana- SONBERSA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== NAZAM ANSARI Son of Isha Mohammad Ansari Resident of Village - Pokharia, P.S.- Bhaktipur, Distt - Sarlahi (Nepal) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Hans Lal Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER 30-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sonbarsa P.S. Case No. 52 of 2019 for offences punishable under Sections 20, 22, 23 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

The prosecution case, as lodged by the SSB officials, is that near Indo-Nepal border they intercepted a motorcycle and apprehended the petitioner and one another co-accused. From the bag of another co-accused Abdul Kudoos Ansari 2 kgs of ganja was recovered, and, accordingly, a seizure-list was prepared.

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he is innocent, bears no criminal history, nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession and he is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25683 of 2019(2) dt.30-04-2019 2/2 languishing in judicial custody since 19.02.2019. However, learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the nature of allegations and the materials on record as well as the fact that the petitioner does not bear any criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph 3 of this application, let petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Sitamarhi, in connection with Sonbarsa P.S. Case No. 52/2019, subject to the condition that one of the bailors would be a close relative of the petitioner having sufficient immovable property, who will file an affidavit stating his relationship with the petitioner.

(Nilu Agrawal, J) Rajesh/- U T