Patna High CourtCWJC/20392/2011disposed

Rajeshwar Ray v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-10-26Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.20392 of 2011 dt.26-10-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20392 of 2011 =========================================================== Rajeshwar Ray S/O Late Yadu Ray R/O Village- Badhauna Tanira, P.S.- Vidyapati Nagar, District- Samastipur .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Food And Civil Supply Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

2. The Commissioner, Darbhanga

3. The District Magistrate, Samastipur

4. The Deputy Development Commissioner, District- Samastipur

5. The Assistant Manager, Samastipur, Food And Supply Department, Samastipur

6. The District Rural Development Agency, Samastipur

7. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sub-Division, Patori, District- Samastipur

8. The Block Development Officer Block- Vidyapati Nagar, District- Samastipur

9. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Bangraha, P.S.- Vidyapatinagar, District - Samastipur

10. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj, Bamgraha, P.S.- Vidyapatinagar, District- Samastipur .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : None For the Respondents : Mr. Anjani Kr Sharan, SC-9 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 26-10-2018 As none appeared on behalf of the petitioner, the matter was passed over for a few cases. However on repeat call, the petitioner was again not represented.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the memo no. 719 dated 08.04.2011, memo no. 724 dated 08.04.2011, memo no. 958 dated 01.08.2011 and memo no. 965 dated 01.08.2011

Patna High Court CWJC No.20392 of 2011 dt.26-10-2018 as contained in Annexure-1 series.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents appears and states that the Enquiry Commission headed by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Udai Sinha (Retired) has now submitted its report and any further action in relation to recovery of the value of undistributed rice under the SGRY Scheme would abide by the decision of the State Government to be taken on the basis of such report.

4. Having regard to the stand of the respondents, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/BT AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 30.10.2018 Transmission Date N.A.