Ganesh Prasad Sah v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21683 of 2011 ====================================================== Ganesh Prasad Sah S/O Jageshwar Singh Resident Of VillageSheikhpuradani, P.S- Keoti, District- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary,Food And Supply Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna.

2. Deputy Development Commissioner, Darbhanga.

3. The District Magistrate, Darbhanga.

4. The Sub- Divisional Officer, Darbhanga.

5. The District Supply Officer, Darbhanga.

6. The Marketing Officer, Darbhanga.

7. The Block Development Officer, Keoti, Darbhana.

8. The Block Development Officer,Keoti, Darbhahga.

9. The Blockj Supply Officer, Keoti, Darbhanga.

10. The Station House Officer, Keoti, Police Station, District- Darbhanga. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar Karn, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Gautam Bose AAG 8 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 29-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order contained in memo no. 1597A dated 22.07.2011 issued under the signature of the Block Development Officer, Keoti by which the petitioner has been directed to deposit the rest amount of undistributed food grains lifted under the SGRY Scheme.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the Enquiry Commission headed by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Udai Sinha (Retired) has now submitted its report and any further action in relation to recovery of the value of undistributed

Patna High Court CWJC No.21683 of 2011 dt.29-10-2018 2/2 rice under the SGRY Scheme would abide by the decision of the State Government to be taken on the basis of such report.

4. In the above view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach this Court afresh as and when the occasion arises in future.

5. Having regard to the stand of the petitioner, the writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.

6. Let the authorities refrain from taking coercive measures against the petitioner until decision is taken by the State Government, as aforesaid.

(Vikash Jain, J) chandran AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 29.10.2018 Transmission Date NA