Munna Ansari v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.54580 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -121 Year- 2016 Thana -CHIRAIYA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Munna Ansari, S/o Ajim Ansari, Residence of village - Rampur, P.S. Chiraiya, Distt. - East Champaran .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Shahjhan Begam, W/o Munna Ansari, D/o Samshuddin Ansari, resident of village - Rampur, P.S. Chiraiya, Distt. - East Champaran .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Nand Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 21-12-2016 Sri Ajay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, in presence of Sri Nand Kumar, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor as well as Sri Sunil Kumar No.3, learned counsel for the complainant/informant/Opp.Party no.2, at the very outset, on instruction, submits that the petitioner, husband of petitioner, is still ready to keep her as wife with full respect and dignity. Sri Sunil Kumar, learned counsel for the informant submits that the informant is ready to reside with the petitioner provided he gives an undertaking that he will not torture and keep her as wife with full respect and dignity.

Considering the stand taken by the parties and the fact that there is possibility of settlement of dispute in between the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54580 of 2016 (2) dt.21-12-2016 2/2 husband and wife, there is no reason to deny the privilege of anticipatory bail.

Accordingly, let the petitioner, namely, Munna Ansari , in the event of his arrest or surrender within six weeks from today , be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-( Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sikarhna at Dhaka , East Champaran in connection with Chiraiya P.S. Case no.121/2016. It is further clearified that at the time of surrender the petitioner will ensure presence of the informant so that on the date of surrender and enlargement on bail the petitioner may take back the informant as wife. It is made clear that if subsequently, the petitioner commits any torture physically and mentally, in that event the informant is only required to file a mentioning slip before this Court and in that event the Court may propose to recall the order and cancel the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) NKS/- U T