← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/21777/2011disposed

Surendra Ram v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-10-29Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21777 of 2011 ====================================================== Surendra Ram Son of Sri Bishnudeo Ram R/O Mansoopur, P.S. - Bidupur, Block : Bidupur, Dist: Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. Dy. Development Commissioner-Cum-Chief Executive Officer, Vaishali

3. The Sub Divisional Office , Bidupur, District Vaishali

4. The Marketing Officer, Bidupur, District - Vaishali

5. The Block Development Officer, Bidupur, Vaishali ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhananjaya Nath Tiwari, Adv For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Parth Sharthi SC10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 29-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the orders dated 07.07.2011 and 29.03.2006 passed by the Block Development Officer, Bidupur by which the petitioner has been directed to deposit the rest amount of undistributed food grains lifted under the SGRY Scheme.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the Enquiry Commission headed by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Udai Sinha (Retired) has now submitted its report and any further action in relation to recovery of the value of undistributed rice under the SGRY Scheme would abide by the decision of the State Government to be taken on the basis of such report.

Patna High Court CWJC No.21777 of 2011 dt.29-10-2018 2/2

4. In the above view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach this Court afresh as and when the occasion arises in future.

5. Having regard to the stand of the petitioner, the writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.

6. Let the authorities refrain from taking coercive measures against the petitioner until decision is taken by the State Government, as aforesaid.

(Vikash Jain, J) chandran AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 29.10.2018 Transmission Date NA