Rambalak Sharma @ Ram Balak Mistri v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27829 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-83 Year-2020 Thana- VISHNUPAD District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

RAMBALAK SHARMA @ RAM BALAK MISTRI S/o Jhulan Mistri Resident of Mohalla-Mangla Gauri, P.S.-Vishnupad, District-Gaya. 2.

Savita Devi W/o Rambalak Sharma @ Ram Balak Mistri Resident of Mohalla-Mangla Gauri, P.S.-Vishnupad, District-Gaya. 3.

Raja Kumar S/o Rambalak Sharma @ Ram Balak Mistri Resident of Mohalla-Mangla Gauri, P.S.-Vishnupad, District-Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ravindra Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G.

For the informant : Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Adv ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-11-2020 Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, the matter is being taken up by way of virtual Court proceeding.

The matter has been listed under the heading "For Orders" under the orders of Hon'ble the Chief Justice. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks after restoration of normalcy. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27829 of 2020(2) dt.27-11-2020 2/3 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 304B, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners is of committing torture and caused death of the victim due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioner Nos. 1, 2, & 3 are father-in-law, mother-in-law and brother-in-law (Bhainsur) of the deceased respectively. They are separate in mess and property from husband of the deceased. They have no concern with the alleged occurrence. The husband of the deceased is in custody. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27829 of 2020(2) dt.27-11-2020 3/3 learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya or his successor in connection with Vishnupad P.S. Case No. 83 of 2020 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V.//- U T