Upendra Singh v. The Union Of India And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 2831 of 2016 ====================================================== Upendra Singh, Son of Sri Jag Narain Singh, Resident of Village - Dhudhani, PO - Kamarpur, PS and District - Buxar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The Union Of India 2.
The Secretary, Ministry of Defence , New Delhi. 3.
The Director General of Police, Central Reserve Police Force Headquarter, Ministry of Defence , New Delhi 4.
The Inspector General of Police, Central Reserve Police Force, M.P. Sector, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh.
5.
The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Range Office, Central Reserve Police Force, Bangrasiya, Bhopal (MP) 6.
The Commandant, 35th Bn, Central Reserve Police Force, c/o 56 APO, Humhuma, Srinagar.
7.
The Assistant Commandant -cum- Enquiry Officer, 35th Bn, Central Reserve Police Force , c/o 56 APO, Humhuma, Srinagar 8.
Reena Devi, wife of Upendra Singh, Daughter of late Paras Nath Singh, Resident of Village- Jagdishpur, PO - Nadaon, PS and District - Buxar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate For Union of India :
Mr S D Sanjay, ASG Mr Abhay Shankar Jha, CGC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 28-03-2019 Learned counsel for the petitioner, faced with the objection of territorial jurisdiction of this Court in respect of orders passed in Sri Nagar and Bhopal, submits that since his revision is pending, he will place reliance on the law as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Avtar Singh -VersusUnion of India & Others reported in (2018) 1 Supreme Court Cases 268, in the pending Revision proceedings.
Patna High Court CWJC No.2831 of 2016(2) dt.28-03-2019 2/2 In view of the said judgment, it is submitted that the petitioner will raise the circumstances which are required to be considered by the authorities in terms of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Avtar Singh (supra). In view of such submission, there is no occasion for this Court to exercise its jurisdiction. The writ petition is disposed of with the liberty, as aforesaid.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./- U