Sanjeet Kumar Singh @ Sanjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45835 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -252 Year- 2017 Thana -SASARAM NAGAR District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Sanjeet Kumar Singh @ Sanjeet Kumar, S/o Sudarshan Singh, Resident of Mohalla-22, Kampany Sarai, Ward No.12, Sasaram, P.S.- Sasaram, District- Rohtas.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Asha Devi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 02-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Sasaram Town (Model) P.S. Case No. 252 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section-392 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that there is no recovery from possession of this petitioner. The recovery of the mobile has been made from possession of co-accused Nandji Singh who disclosed the name of this petitioner. It has further been submitted that other co-accused namely, Kumar Abhishek @ Golu with similar allegation has been granted anticipatory bail by this court vide order dated 11-09-2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 41863 of 2017.

In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner named above in the event

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45835 of 2017 (3) dt.02-11-2017 2/2 of his arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with in Sasaram Nagar P.S. Case No. 252 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas, Sasaram subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T