Karmulla @ Karmulah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.38865 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-87 Year-2017 Thana- MAKER District- Saran ====================================================== KARMULLA @ KARMULAH Son of Abdul Gaffar, Resident of VillageChetnabigha, P.S.- Parsa, District- Saran at Chapra. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rama Kant Sharma, Sr. Advocate and Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. R.B. Roy Raman, APP.l For the Informant: Mr. Amit Kumar Jha, Advocate. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This application for anticipatory bail arises out of Maker P.S. Case N0. 87 of 2017, disclosing offences under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

In view of the fact that the petitioner is an accused in a case under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, I am not inclined to grant the petitioner privilege of anticipatory bail. This application is accordingly dismissed.

The question as to whether there is any material collected in course of investigation can be treated to be against the petitioner can be seen by the court below while considering petitioner's application for regular bail.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38865 of 2017(3) dt.03-11-2017 2/2 I have not perused the case diary.

Let the petitioner appear before the court below within six weeks from today, if so advised. If he does so, his application for regular bail shall be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by rejection of the present application for anticipatory bail by this court.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) arun/- U