Md. Arman @ Arman v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.50524 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -474 Year- 2016 Thana -GAYA MUFFSIL District- GAYA ====================================================== Md. Arman @ Arman, son of Md. Ashraf @ Ashraf (Zia Band), resident of Village- Abqilla Jagdishpur, P.S.- Mufassil, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Sinha, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Sucheta Yadav, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 02-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Mufassil P.S. Case No. 474 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 354(A), 354(C), 153(a) and 295(a) of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is no allegation of any specific overt act against this petitioner. He is not named in the First Information Report. The informant in her re-statement has taken the name of this petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Mufassil P.S. Case No. 474
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50524 of 2017 (2) dt.02-11-2017 2/2 of 2016, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T