Ravi Kumar @ Santosh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28454 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-161 Year-2019 Thana- BAKHTIYARPUR RAIL P.S. DistrictPatna ====================================================== Ravi Kumar @ Santosh Kumar Son of Prakash Chandra Gupta Resident of Village - Aadarsh Nagar, P.S. - Sultanganj, District - Bhagalpur ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr.Amrendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party :
Mr. Addl Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-11-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State through Video Conferencing.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 307 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code, sections 25, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act and sections 145, 147 and 152 of the Railway Act. On raid, some miscreants including the petitioner were arrested, while others managed to escape. Petitioner is alleged to have pointed his pistol during the raid. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that one country made pistol and live cartridge were recovered from the petitioner. Charge sheet has also been filed in the case. He is in custody since 21.10.2019.
In the facts of the case, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner mentioned above be enlarged on
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28454 of 2020(2) dt.11-11-2020 2/2 bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Railway Judicial Magistrate, Patna in GRP Bakhtiarpur (Barh Police Station Case No. 161 of 2019, GR No. 625 of 2019) on the following conditions:-
(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T